Unfortunately, I am using the one that Romney sent to Fran, I think it was late last year. I guess I will get Fran's version and see if it has been updated with fixes not in the version that I have.
Thanks, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale R. Smith > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: VMFTP Question/Problem > > Richard, Mark Wheeler posted a fix to VMFTP for this problem > several year= s ago. Here is the link to the fix for VMFTP: > http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0007&L=vmesa-l&= > P=R7638 > > Or even better, go to Fran Hensler's download page and > download VMFTPUPD = > > VMARC which has this fix and several more included. Fran's > page is at: > http://zvm.sru.edu/~download > > -- > Dale R. Smith > > "In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular." > - Laurence J. Peter > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:33:03 -0800, Schuh, Richard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote= > : > > >We have a fairly straight-forward VMFTP macro that copies > files from an > >SFS subdirectory into a MVS PDS, each filename becoming the member > >name.= > > >The return code from the put seems very odd. The return codes we > >observe= > > >from successful puts are as follows: > > > >* If the byte count is greater than or equal to 1000, then rc=250 > >* If the byte count is less than 1000, then rc=byte count. > > > >Has anyone seen this before? Is everything working as it > should? If so, > >are all real errors indicated by a return code >= 1000? If > not behavin= > g > >itself, is the problem in FTP or VMFTP? > > > >Regards, > >Richard Schuh > > > > > > >
