Thank you to all who have responded. What follows is the latest feedback from 
the person tasked with fixing this problem:
 

Today we were able to re-allocate 512m of central storage to the Linux guests. 
This will place us comfortably  below the 2gig available for VM.

We performed this by a shutdown of the Linux guest, logging on as the user of 
the guest and specifying the new central storage value of (512m).

We then re-ipled  the Linux guest and noted 512m was now the new storage value. 
This however will not persist between IPL's.

The z/VM USER DIRECT file in VM's directory must be edited and the associated 
values for USER changed to the new storage values. The question remains whether 
DIRMAINT will be used to make this change or xedit. We will wait for Bobby on 
Monday to determine what has been used to date.


________________________________

From: Mary Anne Matyaz [
Subject: Re: Performance problem Linux under Zvm


"The real approach is to reduce the working set of the Linux virtual
machines to fit in what you have available, instead of telling CP to
think that it has 2 or 3 times as much.

One way to reduce the working set size is to change the virtual
machines into 512M plus 256M VDISK for cache. It is almost as fast
(because VDISK is data-in-memory) but discourages Linux to use it as
cache. It could also be that the Linux server did not really need 768M
but someone just invented the number (or used this to run the GUI
installer).
If the 512M + 256M does not swap, you can probably lower the 512M and
see where it goes."

Rob, 
Say you inherited a few linuxes and they are webservers, file servers, etc, that
are set at 768M, 1024M, even 1536M. How do you tell what the working set size
is? Is the wss indicated on the perfkit paging screen a valid indicator? 
I can't necessarily get in to these linuxes either. :) 

Thanks, 
Mary Anne

Reply via email to