Jr,

If you are interested in, I can send you a copy of our z/VM440.

Regards
Alain 


Le 4/04/08 3:26, « Imler, Steven J » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> Hmmm ... Les, Alain did say z/VM FOUR.FOUR ... it's for sure there are
> likely CP changes (DIAG 254 "things" come to mind) that might effect
> this behavior in some way ... again keeping in mind his HOST is running
> z/VM 4.4.0 (except for the test when everything WORKED! [when he had
> z/VM 5.3 running 1st level in addition to his test guest system]).
> 
> In any case, I have no way to go back to prove this ... all our hosts
> are z/VM 5.3 and we generally are running the GA release of z/VM at GA
> for all our hosts.  So it's been a LONG time since we've had z/VM
> 4.anything as "top dog".
> 
> JR
> 
> JR (Steven) Imler
> CA
> Senior Software Engineer
> Tel:  +1 703 708 3479
> Fax:  +1 703 708 3267
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Geer (607-429-3580)
>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 08:42 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Question about virtual tape in a zVM environment
>> 
>>> Les and JR,
>>> 
>>> Firstly :
>>> Thanks to gave me the info 'PMH 84921,004,000'. I asked our
>> hardware to l
>>> 
>>> ook
>>> at this. I don't have a feedback yet.
>>> 
>>> Secondly :
>>> I was able to IPL our z/VM530 today and ...
>>> - from z/VM440, I ipled z/VM530 2nd lvl and did a test about
>> the target :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> nothing changed. Problem still alive :(
>>> 
>>> - I ipled z/VM530 1st lvl and did a test, then did it again
>> and again to
>>> 
>>> be
>>> absolutely sure. I washed my glasses and yes our problem
>> disappeared. NO
>>> MORE PROBLEM !!!
>>> 
>>> So it was not a hardware problem. Glad to see this has been
>> corrected in
>>> 
>>> the
>>> z/VM version.
>>> 
>> 
>> There isn't anything in a newer release of z/VM that would change the
>> behavior of this problem.  It really is a hardware problem.
>> This problem only occurs when you use VOLSPECIFIC as a target
>> category on a mount request.
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Les Geer
>> IBM z/VM and Linux Development
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to