Won't this put the stem records *after* the original contents 
of SECOND FILE? The OP said:
> 2. append an existing file after the above file
which I understand to mean that the stem records must be
*before* the original contents.

Shimon



---- Original message ----
>Date:   Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:00:48 -0400
>From:   Richard Troth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject:   Re: pipe question  
>To:   [email protected]
>
>   "Ooo ooo, Mr. Cah-terr!"
>
>   /* REXX */
>   'PIPE STEM MYSTEM. | > FIRST FILE A | >> SECOND FILE
>   A'
>
>   On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Lionel B. Dyck
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>     I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
>
>     1. copy records from a stem into a file
>     2. append an existing file after the above file
>
>     I don't seem to be having any success with it and
>     would appreciate any good example or some
>     direction.
>
>     Thanks in advance
>
>     ------------------------------------------------
>
>     Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
>     Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe
>     Engineering
>     KP-IT Enterprise Engineering
>     925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail:
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck
>     Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our
>     passion is service. We're here to make lives
>     better."
>     I never guess. It is a capital mistake to theorize
>     before one has data. Insensibly one begins to
>     twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories
>     to suit facts.
>     - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>     NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended
>     recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from
>     sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing
>     its contents. If you have received this e-mail in
>     error, please notify the sender immediately by
>     reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail
>     and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
>     saving them. Thank you.
>
>   --
>   -- R; <><

Reply via email to