Richard, such a behaviour with the low returncode (4 or so) I would
think to be correct. Then it would be easier to check the status with a
rexx procedure,
kind regards
Franz Josef Pohlen
Schuh, Richard schrieb:
Not quite true. If there is no MDISK defined to include the omitted high
cylinders, the results will be perfectly good and usable. ABEND would be
a hostile act in this case. At worst, DDR should end with a low return
code and a message saying that n cylinders were not copied due to the
discrepancy.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore
Alan,
But the main reason why I think that DDR
should abend or at least give a return code other than zero
is, that when you RESTORE ALL to a minidisk which is too
small, the only result can be garbage.
