I'm totally confused.
Routing table from HostA (z/OS 1.9 LPAR)
netstat
route
 EZZ2350I MVS TCP/IP NETSTAT CS V1R9       TCPIP Name: TCPIP
13:00:42
 EZZ2755I Destination         Gateway          Flags     Refcnt
Interface
 EZZ2756I -----------         -------          -----     ------
---------
 EZZ2757I Default             199.44.nnn.1     UGS       000000
MPCLNK1


 EZZ2757I 10.6.0.0/24         0.0.0.0          US        000002
IUTLNK1


 EZZ2757I 10.6.0.3/32         0.0.0.0          UH        000000
IUTLNK1


 EZZ2757I 127.0.0.1/32        0.0.0.0          UH        000000
LOOPBACK


 EZZ2757I 199.44.nnn.0/25     0.0.0.0          US        000002
MPCLNK1


 EZZ2757I 199.44.nnn.66/32    0.0.0.0          UH        000000
MPCLNK1

And Hostb (z/OS 1.9 as a z/VM guest) that does not work.
netstat
route
 EZZ2350I MVS TCP/IP NETSTAT CS V1R9       TCPIP Name: TCPIP
13:00:33
 EZZ2755I Destination         Gateway          Flags     Refcnt
Interface
 EZZ2756I -----------         -------          -----     ------
---------
 EZZ2757I Default             199.44.nnn.1     UGS       000000
MPCLNK1


 EZZ2757I 10.6.0.0/24         0.0.0.0          US        000000
IUTLNK1


 EZZ2757I 10.6.0.20/32        0.0.0.0          UH        000000
IUTLNK1


 EZZ2757I 127.0.0.1/32        0.0.0.0          UH        000000
LOOPBACK


 EZZ2757I 199.44.nnn.0/25     0.0.0.0          US        000001
MPCLNK1


 EZZ2757I 199.44.nnn.70/32    0.0.0.0          UH        000000
MPCLNK1


They look the same to me.


On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Wednesday, 04/23/2008 at 10:41 EDT, Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Does it make a difference that Hipersockets are real devices dedicated
> to the
> > z/OS guest and the OSA connection is a VSWITCH?  The OSA connection on
> the
> > VSWITCH works,  the real Hipersockets do not.
>
> Sorry if I misunderstood.  If HostA and HostB are on the same HiperSocket
> chpid and cannot ping each other, then there is a routing problem (bad IP
> address, subnet, or subnet mask, or incorrect dynamic route).
>
> As always, draw a picture and make sure the picture is "legal".  I've seen
> people with syntactically perfect configuration files but a configuration
> that violates the Natural Laws of Networking.
>
> Then display the routing table on both HostA and HostB to see if they are
> consistent.
>
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott
>



-- 
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems

Reply via email to