Alan or Chuckie?

I'm not 100% sure, so Steve Imler may have to chime in, but if your
using VM:Tape, VM:Backup, et al, these products may look for certain
messages to be posted before doing something else.  Of course if you
don't use the CA products or DFSMS, this probably doesn't apply.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: The Programmable Operator Facility

Alan may have fits over giving such power to users at logon time.

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: The Programmable Operator Facility
> 
> Personally I think ATTACH and DETACH (and others too i.e. 
> DIAL) should have a NOMSG type option to just eliminate the 
> message alltogether.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Kris Buelens
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: The Programmable Operator Facility
> 
> 
> In PROP, logging is all or nothing.  VM:Operator has a NOLOG 
> option, I don't know about IBM Operations Manager.
> 
> At the other hand: DASD isn't that expensive, incomplete log 
> files make debugging less easy.  Alternatively, you could 
> postprocess the log file of the previous day and code a PIPE 
> filter to remove what you don't want to keep.
> 
> 2008/7/9 Ray Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > We run z/VM 520 and use PROPST to filter messages to the 
> OP1 console. We filter several commands including ATTACHED 
> and DETACHED commands.
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to filter other messages such as ATTACHED and 
> DETACHED from going to the LOG FILE (LGYYMMDD XXXXXX) on 
> Operator's 191 MDISK. In reading the CMS Planning and 
> Administration Guide, I don't see how this can be done. We 
> are a heavy TAPE use shop using DFSMS/RMS and there are just 
> too many of these messages going to this log file.
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there a way to suppress the logging of certain messages?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ray Waters
> >
> > Mainframe Technical Support Analyst
> >
> > Open Solutions Inc.
> > 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 300
> > Houston, TX  77046-1102
> >
> > Office 713-965-8451
> >
> > Cell 713-705-5403
> >
> > Fax    713-965-8405
> >
> > Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > www.bank.opensolutions.com
> >
> > www.opensolutions.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > NOTICE:
> > This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the 
> individual to whom it is addressed and may contain 
> information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
> exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this e-mail is not 
> the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible 
> for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or 
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
> have received this communication in error, please immediately 
> notify us by replying to the original message at the listed 
> email address. Thank You.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Kris Buelens,
> IBM Belgium, VM customer support
> 

Reply via email to