On Wednesday, 08/06/2008 at 04:42 EDT, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Mark Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Is that stack association limit correct? If this is the case, is there a > >> circumvention? Can multiple OSA adapters be associated with a single VLAN? > > > > Use a VSWITCH, since you've already decided this is going to be run on z/VM. > > The limit is model dependent, for z9 way more than 640 IIRC. > > The way to get around it (once) is to make the VM system primary > router so it will get all packets for which the OSA has no entry in > the OAT. I think the limit also applies to the number of stacks on the > VSWITCH. There isn't a way for VSWITCH to set primary router, is > there?
Yes, there is (the PRIROUTER option), but who cares? Define the VSWITCH as ETHERNET (layer 2), not IP. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
