On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know there are some performance folks out there (Velocity, IBM > (Omegamon)) any thoughts on this from you all? The "transaction" as observed by CP relates to applications running in CMS. It has no meaning in the context of the transactions in the application running in Linux. However, when the virtual machine is using minimal CPU resources and CP still does not recognize transactions, you may conclude that the application is polling and thus hurting scalability (since memory management is based on dropping from queue when idle). Rob -- Rob van der Heij Velocity Software http://velocitysoftware.com/
