On: Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 02:56:21PM -0700,Daniel Allen Wrote: } I have a 3390-3 volume that is used to store users 191 minidisks. } } In the previous three (3) z/VM systems (4.3, 5.2 and 5.3), this volume } has been CP-OWNED. } } Is there a reason to continue the practice for z/VM 5.4 ?
Besides what Marty, Rich and Dave said there is one more possible reason to have a volume containing only minidisks be CP-OWNED. If the volume is CP-OWNED and is not available at IPL time, CP will complain so it can be fixed. -- Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353 Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines:Val, Red, Shasta & Casey (RIP), Red & Zero, Siberians Owner:Chinook-L Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
