Shouldn't someone have to initialize the new tapes before they are used?
They at least need a dummy header label before there is an EOF.

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of James Stracka (DHL US)
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:16 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: VTS and New Virtual Tapes
> 
> We are having a problem with our VTS and new virtual scratch 
> tapes and were wondering if anyone has experienced a similar problem.
> 
> If we mount a new virtual scratch tape, by this I mean a tape 
> which has never had any data of any form written to it, "TAPE 
> FSF 1" fails with "DMSP2C110S Error reading TAP1(181)".  Once 
> any form of data is written to the tape such as "TAPE WTM" 
> then the "TAPE FSF 1" works.  We were wondering if this is a 
> hardware, software or installation problem.  We have opened 
> ETRs with both IBM Hardware and Software support.
> 
> Here is a console log:
> 
> tmm tapemnt scr
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:11
>  EUMTAP0072I Mount request 004877 received.
>  EUMTAP0079I Mount request 004877 pending.
> EUMTAP0109I Device 0E6B attached to SCXJXS as 0181 with volume 379963.
> FILEDEF INMOVE TAP1 (RECFM U LRECL 32760 Ready; T=0.01/0.01 
> 12:01:28 FILEDEF OUTMOVE TERMINAL Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:32 
> rew 181 Rewind complete Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:37 movefile
> VOL1379963
> HDR10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> 0000000000
> 0000000
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:40
> rew 181
> Rewind complete
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:47
> tape fsf 1
> DMSP2C110S Error reading TAP1(181)
> Ready(00100); T=0.01/0.01 12:01:50
> movefile
> VOL1379963
> HDR10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> 0000000000
> 0000000
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:54
> tape wtm
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:01:59
> rew 181
> Rewind complete
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:02:03
> tape fsf 1
> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:02:06
> 
> As you can see, MOVEFILE can read the tape but TAPE FSF 1 gets upset.
> 
> Jim
> 

Reply via email to