On 03/04/2009 01:02 AM, IBMVM automatic digest system wrote:
Long ago, in a galaxy close to where I am this week, there was a PGP
MODULE. It was built by a kind person at MIT (which is NOT close to
where I am this week) and worked exactly as one would expect it to work.
Maybe some day we will have a PGP for CMS again. Dunno.
Recently, PGP got interesting again (to me). Actually, GPG is what I
use instead (for better or worse). So it occured to me that when there
is a face-to-face opportunity, such as that enjoyed by those fortunate
souls who made the trek to Central Texas, the subject of key signing
should be kept in mind. Therefore, if you happen to be in Austin this
week and have a GPG key and want a signature, let me know. At least,
let SOMEONE know. (My signature may not be what you need, and I am okay
with that. But ... get yer keys signed!)
some old email discussing pgp-like implementation for the internal
network
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006w.html#email810505
in this post
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006w.html#12 more secure communication over the
network
and
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007d.html#email810506
in this post
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007d.html#49 certificate distribution
misc. old public key &/or crypto email
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/lhwemail.html#crypto
misc. past posts mentioning the internal network ... which was larger than the
arpanet/internet from just about the beginning, until sometime late '85 or
possibly early '86
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#internalnet
--
40+yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar70
