I'll have to re-visit this at a later time. I (we) converted to 5.4 this past weekend and I'm doing a post install "mop up". Thanks to all who replied. Steve
-----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES On Tuesday, 07/14/2009 at 08:53 EDT, "Gentry, Stephen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that is what I?m trying to do and it works. That is to say the pipe doesn?t > abend or fail. What happens is I get different results when I run it from > an EXEC (with the PIPE command in it) vs. when I run it from the command line. Your screen shots were not redistributed or stored by the listserver, so I'm not really clear on what the problem is. Try plain-text copy/paste. Except for the functions specifically supported by NETSTAT EXEC, my test case gets the same result using PIPE CMS NETSTAT or PIPE COMMAND NETSTAT, whether I run it an exec (address CMS or address command) or from the command line. The exec runs when I use PIPE CMS NETSTAT and does not run when I use PIPE COMMAND NETSTAT. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
