Yes, the two userids were recycled after the updates to the various confi
g 
files.  I don't know that all the drives had been attached/detached from 

RMSMASTR before I xautologed VGLIBSRV.  I can sure try that to see if it 

helps.  

Jeff Forte


On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:57:03 -0400, Ray Waters 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Did you cycle RMSMASTR, VGLIBSRV?
>
>How I do it is(from MY VM ID): STOP_VGS I
>
>Then
>CP FORCE RMSMASTR
>CP FORCE VGLIBSTRV
>
>Next XAUTOLGO RMSMASTR
>CP Q TAPE ATTACH RMSMASTR
>Wait until all tapes have been attached/detached to/from RMSMASTR
>Then: CP XAUTOLOG VGLIBSRV
>
>Ray Waters
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On 

Behalf Of Jeff Forte
>Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:49 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Multiple VTS libraries - RMSMASTR & VGLIBSRV
>
>We are trying to add an additional VTS library to one of our z/VM system
s
>running VSE guests.  I have made the updates to the RMCONFIG DATA (Add t
he
>new drives) and DGTVCNTL DATA (Add additional RM_AUTO_LIBRARY)in
>VMSYS:DFSMS.CONTROL.  On VGLIBSRV, I've updated the LIBCONFG LIST to
>include the new library name and updated FSMRMVGC EXEC to add the
>additional drives to the DRIVE_LIST_3490 variable.  This seems to be the

>only required updates, yet when the VSE guest submits their jobs, the
>VGLIBSRV console shows the following -
>
>10:49:32.232091 New request type: QS CID=00000000 RID=VSE3SBX
>10:49:32.267682 QS request complete. ID=0  RC=8 Reason=5026
>10:49:32.325331 New request type: MV CID=00000001 RID=VSE3SBX
>10:49:32.326188 MV request complete. ID=0  RC=8 Reason=5026
>
>That reason code says
>
>5026    Library not known       The library name specified in a request 
is
>not found in the VGS library configuration file LIBCONFG LIST A. Update 
or
>correct this file and retry the request.
>
>With the one library defined, we have no issues at all with the drives
>being attached to the VSE guest.  Only when trying to define the new VTS
.
>Once all the data is migrated, we will delete the old addresses.
>
>What am I missing ??
>
>Jeff Forte
>
>NOTICE:
>This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it 

is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential
 
or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this e-mail is not 

the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for deliverin
g 
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 

dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
immediately notify us by replying to the original message at the listed 

email address. Thank You.

Reply via email to