On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Bill Holder <hold...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I don't entirely agree. The action of the guest did not cause harm > to CP, it was the action of the operations staff which did. This > is not a denial of service case that I can see.
Hm. So by that rationale, we can make STORE H class G, because it won't be the *guest* harming CP, it will be the end-user who types the command.
