Plus the DVHXLV9666T isn't documented...that I could find. MA On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Alan Altmark <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Friday, 10/02/2009 at 01:12 EDT, [email protected] wrote: > > > Thank you for your immediate response. I see that the maint id had 11F > disk > > accessed which as you say caused our problem. Thanks again this very > > supportive group! > > You might consider talking to the Support Center. DVHXLVL has a couple of > problems: > > 1. It doesn't handle the "default" case properly for the message. (There's > supposed to be something between LEVEL and the comma.) > 2. It doesn't report any specifics of the error. It should at least relay > the CP error message from the LINK. > > I can't predict if they will consider it a defect or not. They may want > you to open a requirement. > > Alan Altmark > z/VM Development > IBM Endicott >
