Hello Rob

Appreciate all help

Here is a snapshot

RESOURCE PART=((CSS(0),(AUTO1,1),(AUTO2,2),(ZVMLNX,3),(ZVMLNX2,4)))    
CHPID PCHID=160,PATH=(CSS(0),60),TYPE=CNC,PART=(AUTO1,ZVMLNX),SHARED   
CHPID PCHID=161,PATH=(CSS(0),61),TYPE=CTC,PART=(AUTO1,ZVMLNX),SHARED   
**********************************************************            
* CHANNEL    PCHID 160 og 161   Channel to Channel       *            
*                            between z/VSE PROD og z/VM  *            
**********************************************************            
 CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3000,PATH=(60),UNITADD=((00,32)),UNIT=SCTC          
 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(100,32),CUNUMBR=(3000),UNIT=SCTC                   
 CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3010,PATH=(61),UNITADD=((00,32)),UNIT=SCTC          
 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(400,32),CUNUMBR=(3010),UNIT=SCTC   

It's genned without errors and what I can see from the HMC console is that
Both channels 60 and 61 is online.                 

Hilsen Geir Fladby
AutoData Norge AS
tlf 23 17 20 34

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne av 
Rob van der Heij
Sendt: 27. november 2009 11:20
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: Channel to Channel and IBM Communication Server on z/VM Linux

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Geir Fladby <[email protected]> wrote:
> Env: z/VSE 4.2 and z/VM 5.4 running in separate Lpars on Z9.
>
> Currently we use Ibm Comm Server on Windows platform connecting to z/VSE
> Host via Bustech
> Channel attached card.
>
> As we have z/VM 5.4 with Sles10 and installed IBM Communication Server
> in a linux machine
> we now try to get in contact with z/VSE via Channel to channel, MPC.

Hej, Geir.

Forgive me asking. I'm not deep enough in IBM CC to know that this
should work, but have you verified that the CTC connection between the
LPARs is actually working?  It's not hard to get the IOCP definitions
wrong (it seems people with z/OS background using CF define them
differently).

If you care to send a snippet of IOCP offline, I would be happy to eyeball it...

Vennlig hilsen, Rob

Reply via email to