I find the idea that there is 'nothing new under the sun' as crippling and
undermining man's ingenuity.  It's a singularly cynical passage..    all is
vanity, indeed.   phooey.   Glad you scraped some kind of positive message
off of it...

Scott


On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Jack Woehr <[email protected]> wrote:

>  [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> Is that the future for the mainframe ? **
>
> The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.
> Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.
> What profit hath a man of all his labor which he taketh under the sun?
> One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth
> abideth for ever.
> The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place
> where he arose.
> The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it
> whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his
> circuits.
> All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full: unto the place
> from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.
> All things are full of labor; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied
> with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing.
> The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done
> is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
> Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been
> already of old time, which was before us.
> There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any
> remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.
> - Ecclesiastes 1:1-11
>
> The best management stuff is always hiding there in the Bible. They just
> don't teach folks anymore  to read it the right way.
>
> --
> Jack J. Woehr            # Reality is unpredictable, and no amount of 
> computer technologyhttp://www.well.com/~jax <http://www.well.com/%7Ejax> # is 
> going to change that.  - David Brooks, conservative pundit, 
> http://www.softwoehr.com # "The God That Fails", 2009-12-31 New York Times
>
>

Reply via email to