Hi Mike and thanks for the update.

According to our performance product we do NOT need an additional IFL at this 
time but it was included as part of the z10 upgrade so I wanted to utilize it.

Thanks,
Nick


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 2 to 3 IFLs

Nick,

Disclaimer: I'm not a performance geek.

I presume that you believe that you need to add a third virtual processor 
to each Linux guest's virtual machine definition (directory entry) for it 
to use the added third real processor.  That's not true.  Unless 
constrained in some way, CP will automatically spread the work of all 
Linux guests across all the real engines to which it has access. 

Adding more virtual engines to guests can actually cause more thrashing 
and overhead unless a performance management product clearly shows that 
the multithreading supported by that guest real has a bottleneck of 
backlogged threads tat could be dispatched on other engines.  We have 
three z/OS running happily with two virtual general purpose engines, while 
CP spreads their work evenly across three real general purpose engines.

Which performance product results have you been using to determine if the 
Linux guests need an added virtual processor?

And now I turn this thread over to the real performance geeks who will 
happily point out any errors in my advice (which may just end up serving 
to inspire debate and shared knowledge). 

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.










"Harris, Nick J." <[email protected]> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <[email protected]>
01/05/2010 09:32 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <[email protected]>



To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
2 to 3 IFLs







Hello All,
 
We are upgrading our z9BC to a z10BC and increasing the IFLs from two to 
three.  I am planning on modifying the Linux guest definitions to utilize 
the third IFL.  Are there any performance issues or problems adding a 
third IFL?  I can?t imagine this would do anything but help, I?m just 
checking. 
 
We are running z/VM 5.4 in support of Linux guests. 
 
TIA! 
 
 
 
Nick Harris
Lead Systems Programmer, Information Systems
[email protected]
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies
P. O. Box 2689 Waco, TX. 76702-2689
Phone 254.751.2259
      
 
 





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message (including attachments) 
is covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 
2510-2521, and is CONFIDENTIAL.  If you believe that it has been sent to 
you in error, do not read it. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank 
you. 

.
 
 





The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 

Reply via email to