On Tuesday, 03/23/2010 at 11:20 EDT, "Gentry, Stephen" <[email protected]> wrote: > I was able to replicate this. > Don't use the +1 option, just use * (asterisk) > With the +1 option the virtual address that vmlink assigns starts at 1 > Each subsequent issue of vmlink increments the virtual address vmlink > assigns. > Guess what happens when you have 9 assigned and you add 1 to that? > The next virtual address becomes A (or technically 000A) I guess vmlink > then assumes you want to replace your original A disk with address A. > Almost seems like there is a vmlink error but, then again, functioning > as designed.
Delete the phrase "Almost seems like". That would be a bug that needs to be called in. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
