It doesn't choke at the current limit of 5000. We will see what happens later.
Regards, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RXSOCKET > > Actually, I am surprised that it does not choke completely. :-) > > > Tony Thigpen > > -----Original Message ----- > From: Schuh, Richard > Sent: 05/17/2010 06:35 PM > > I don't remember saying anything about efficiency. > > > > Regards, > > Richard Schuh > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen > >> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:05 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: RXSOCKET > >> > >> You have a rexx based system that exceeds 5000 concurrent > sockets? I > >> would not have expected such an animal to run with any efficiency. > >> > >> > >> Tony Thigpen > >> > >> -----Original Message ----- > >> From: Schuh, Richard > >> Sent: 05/17/2010 05:59 PM > >>> Is the 5000 socket limit for a user of RXSOCKET architectural or > >>> arbitrary? If arbitrary, will it be am major effort to > >> increase it to > >>> something in the 12-16K range? And is increasing it > >> something that the > >>> customer can do or is it a trade secret? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Richard Schuh > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > >
