Wah?  Someone has gotten the same auditor 2x?  And one that knows how to spell 
VM? That sounds like an exposure right there :P )

Marcy 
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:32 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Automated Logoff of CMS user

If they come back and say LOGOFF, then argue with them on the real security of 
the
terminate communications path and the requirement for reauthentication prior to 
any user
interaction with programs in that virtual machine.

If you win, it may be a small victory but it will help you the next time you 
need to argue
bigger things with them.

/Tom Kern

Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Sorry for the late response I did not have connectivity for awhile. 
> 
> Anyway yes basically what Marcy mentioned is about what the requirement
> read. The emulater forcing locking of the desk top did not seem to
> please them. 
> 
> So I will look into TUNEFR from velocity. I say LOGOFF because it was
> their terminology but I will being using FORCE DISC instead.
> 
> Thanks for all of the information! 
> 
> Thank You,
> 
> Terry Martin
> Lockheed Martin - Citic
> z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
> Office - 443 348-2102
> Cell - 443 632-4191

Reply via email to