The 'biggest one' has less than 2G. 0% paging. Activity was close to zero. Poor activity in the cache too... I checked for the quicdsp option. In place too... DASD array is a DS8000 supersized in ficon. The machine there is a z9 S38 globaly 10 more powerful than the one we have at home. CPU never higher than 10%.
Le 17 juin 2010 à 20:11, Marcy Cortes a écrit : > OK, but do they add up to more than 20G? > i.e. are you paging? > > Marcy > "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you > are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you > must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any > information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise > the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for > your cooperation." > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Alain Benveniste > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM > > Marcy > > The sizes of those zOS under z/VM are exactly the sizes they have in lpar at > home... > > Alain > > > Le 17 juin 2010 à 19:23, Marcy Cortes a écrit : > >> What's the memory size of each of those 8 virtual machines? >> >> >> Marcy >> >> >> "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you >> are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you >> must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or >> any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please >> advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank >> you for your cooperation." >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Alain Benveniste >> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:54 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [IBMVM] Multiple z/OS under z/VM =xSYSTEM >> >> Back from a DR test, the feedback I have from users is that a simple 'ent= >> er' >> on z/OS generate a xSYSTEM, short for me, but really embarassing for the >> users... >> We run a zVM530 with 8 zOS in 1.8 as guest, 20G real storage, 4000mips. A= >> ll >> the DASD are defined as MDISK with MW. I gave access to the 8 processors = >> for >> the zOS. MDC is on. No real activity on those partitions. What am I suppo= >> sed >> to look at ? I took a look at the DIRMAINT options... Nothing flashing ! = >> >> Do I have to consider this behavior as 'normal' ? IS at to see with the >> reserve/release on DASD, MDISK translation... >> >> Any suggestions ? >> >> Alain Benveniste
