Isn't Not_accepted/Not_Sensed(unsupported) more to do with how CP handles devices Dynamically defined/added by a different LPar(Not_Accepted, specifically)?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Schuh, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, but there are the intermittent times when we need to see some of them. > When needed, that can be accomplished via command, without requiring an > update to the IOCP or LPAR Profile. The MVS security people want us to not > even be able to vary them online except in special circumstances; thus, the > Not_Accepted status. More proof that, "All generalities are wrong, including > this one." > > Regards, > Richard Schuh -- Gregg Reed "No Plan, survives execution"
