>From a colleague on the vse-l mailing list.
Billy
------- Forwarded message follows -------
I only just this week discovered that the VSE BSM does not
support group within group security. Meaning, if you have two
security groups of users -- say, IT managers and IT employees -- and
you try to include the IT managers as IT employees just by adding
the IT managers security group into the IT employees security group,
then the VSE BSM (as currently implemented) will not return the
correct access levels for the IT managers so defined.
IBM Level 2 confirmed that this is a restriction of the VSE
BSM and, they think, also of RACF (but they weren't 100% certain).
Can anybody familiar with RACF confirm or deny such a restriction?
Can anybody familiar with other top-notch security products confirm
or deny whether those products, also, sport such a restriction? It
seems, to me, that group within group security would be such a
commonplace thing to want to do that I'm surprised to find that the
VSE BSM does not support this.
Now, I do understand that such a defined sub-group would
logically obtain the same access level as is defined for the main
group. I further understand that in order to obtain a different
access level for such a sub-group that the sub-group would have to
be defined directly, as a main group, to the security resource in
question. I also understand that, under the scenario I've described
so far, this would result in the same group being defined twice to
the same security resource -- once as a sub-group and once as a
main group. However, I don't see this as a problem because a main
group definition should logically take precedence anyway. I just
object to having to always define only main groups in order to
obtain the desired security access levels.
Sincerely,
Dave Clark
WinWholesale Group Services
3110 Kettering Boulevard
Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA
(937) 294-5331
********************************************************************
*************************
This email message and any attachments is for use only by the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential, privileged and/or
proprietary information. If you have received this message in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete and destroy the
message and all copies. All unauthorized direct or indirect use or
disclosure of this message is strictly prohibited. No right to
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any error in
transmission.
********************************************************************
*************************
------- End of forwarded message -------