DIRMAINT is just a directory manager. It is similar to the directory manager 
component of VM:Secure. DIRMAINT does have the capability to do mass updates of 
the directory. VM:Secure does not. I have my own form of mass updater. I create 
code to perform the update of a generic single user and temporarily EXECLOAD it 
as PROFILE XEDIT. Then I run a pipe that looks something like this:

'PIPE < id list a | spec /vmsecure edit/ 1 w1 nw | cms | > log file a'

It usually runs quickly because our directory has fewer than 2000 userids in 
it. It might not be acceptable on a system with 10000+ userids.

Regards,
Richard Schuh





________________________________
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Duplicate VOLID's

Hmm..   RACF isn't really related as it's protecting minidisks on z/VM, at 
least - and doesn't care about volsers the mindisks are on.    The process for 
DIRMAINT is probably similar to the things that need doing on VM:Secure to do 
the directory changes:

-  Make a 'monolithic' copy of the directory and run a PIPE to change all 
volsers..  then initialize DIRMAINT using the new directory (USER INPUT)
-  Put the directory online (DIRM DIRECT)
-  Change EXTENT CONTROL similarly and do a DIRM RLDE

I'm in favor of labels using the rdev - unless you really have frequent changes 
of DASD - to me, the benefits outweigh the occassional need to update the 
directory.   YMMV, as this thread indicates.

Scott Rohling

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Schuh, Richard 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
That is absolutely the wrong thing to do. I am now suffering because someone 
else did that to dasd that is EMFFd to 3 LPARS. (It was all ZLccuu). It 
requires meticulous record keeping and is very error prone. I did wipe out a 
disk needed by one system because the records I received were not complete 
Fortunately, it was a disk that was to be used by a new system and had not been 
updated; it was easy to restore. Also, it is a huge headache if you ever 
replace your DASD. I don't know about RACF, but there is no mechanism built 
into VM:Secure for easily doing a mass update of volsers ( I know, you can 
change the volser with one command - if it is a VM:Secure .controlled disk and 
nobody is linked to it. The latter is hard to achieve around here.)

Regards,
Richard Schuh





________________________________
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of 
Michael MacIsaac
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:55 AM

To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Duplicate VOLID's


>I do know what addresses my system disks are on,
Ah! - an argument for the convention of using the RDEV as the last four 
characters of the volser :))

"Mike MacIsaac" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>   (845) 433-7061

Reply via email to