That's then to confuse everyone 0 and O, who can tell the difference unless having a very good font, and even then.
If you change, change it better, not more work Why not 54TRES, 54TW01 etc 2010/9/29 George Henke/NYLIC <george_he...@newyorklife.com> > > As always, Alan, ty for the good advice. > > I have renamed with CPFMTXA the 2nd Level disks to 54O(Oh)RES, 54O(Oh)W01, > adn 54O(Oh)W02 and will copy the 2 page and 2 spool disks just for > simplicity, neatness counts. > > > > *Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com>* > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > > 09/28/2010 11:59 PM > Please respond to > The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > > To > IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > cc > Subject > Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice > > > > > On Tuesday, 09/28/2010 at 04:35 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC > <george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote: > > Can I bring up z/VM Level 2 wiith the same cloned volser's, directory, > and CF > > parm disks as z/VM Level 1 as long as I point to the cloned 540RES and > FORCE > > start when I IPL? > > > > I have DDRed my 540RES, 540W01, 540W02, Level 1 disks to separate disks > and > > they now have the same volsers. > > > > Do I need to also DDR the PAG and SPL disks or can I just FORCE start > with > > empty disks. > > You need to copy the disks or CPFMTXA them. > > > The directory and CF parm disks came over with 540RES. Since the names > have > > not changed Is their "referential integrity" still intact? > > Unless you follow my previously posted advice about using OFFLINE_AT_IPL, > duplicate volids create the potential for bad things to happen. I suggest > you change the volsers (which means changing SYSTEM CONFIG and USER > DIRECT). > > Alan Altmark > > z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant > IBM System Lab Services and Training > ibm.com/systems/services/labservices > office: 607.429.3323 > alan_altm...@us.ibm.com > IBM Endicott > > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
