Hello Kris,

 

Would you send that newsletter to me too, please?

 

Ed Martin

Aultman Health Foundation

330-363-5050

ext 35050

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 9:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SFS - misunderstanding

 

That's something left over from the early SFS days in 1988: one wanted
to make SFS as transparently as possible to old programs: old programs
check a bit in CMS' disk table (ADT), and if that bit tells "R/W" they
suppose they can write to it.  Not always so with SFS, maybe you can
write to file 1 on a directory, but not to file 2.  Therefore: ACCESS of
some one else's directory turned the R/W flag off in the ADT.
To make usage at all possible: 
- XEDIT and COPYFILE were changed to check the SFS authority, and not
the ADT bit
- ERASE and RENAME: if you code a filemode: they continue to check the
ADT bit;
                                    if you code a dirid: they check the
SFS authority of the file.
Later was added  ACCESS xxx (FORCERW and FORCERW, makes it possible to
set the ADT bit they way you want
FILELIST and DIRLIST got a READWRITE option.

Even later: people (like Rob?) complained that XEDIT and COPYFILE could
still overwrite files in a directory accessed as R/O.  So was the SET
RORESPECT born.

I'll send you "VM Newsletter 4" that we sent to the Belgian VM community
back in 1995.  SFS Auhtorities was the main subject of nr 4.

2010/10/5 Mark Pace <[email protected]>

Yes, I am an administrator for the file pool.

 

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
<[email protected]> wrote:

Are you the administrator for the file pool?

 

 

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.

 

 

________________________________

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: SFS - misunderstanding

 

I admit that I've always stayed away from SFS.  But recently I've
decided to use it to share files between VM systems.

Here is something I don't understand.  I access a SFS, it shows as R/O,
yet I can edit and save a file, but then can't erase it?!

What am I missing that allows me to edit a file on a R/O accessed SFS?

 

acc vmuser:ddisk. d                

DMSACR723I D (VMUSER:DDISK.) R/O   

Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:09:27        

 

q disk d


LABEL  VDEV M  STAT   CYL TYPE BLKSZ   FILES  BLKS USED-(%) BLKS LEFT
BLK TOTAL 

-      DIR  D   R/O     -    - 4096      281             -          -
- 

 

xedit test data d

     I changed and saved the file.

Ready; T=0.01/0.01 08:06:08

 

erase test data d                              

DMSERS037E Filemode D is accessed as read/only 

Ready(00036); T=0.01/0.01 08:07:33             

 

 

 


-- 

Mark D Pace 

Senior Systems Engineer 

Mainline Information Systems 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________ This message
contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely
for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution,
or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us
at [email protected]. 





-- 

Mark D Pace 

Senior Systems Engineer 

Mainline Information Systems 

 

 

 

 




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support

Reply via email to