No this actually requires a real CTC, if you have a test system, and have a 
spare CTC device address Then you are OK, but connecting 1st Level to 2nd 
Level, I believe, for ISFC is not supported.

Larry Davis

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: z/VM ISFC links

Hi, Clovis -
Thanks, but I knew how to do that.  I've used VCTC between guests for years.  
What I needed, but apparently is not supported is a VCTC, connecting CP to a 
virtual machine for ISFC links.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:40 PM, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Now I'm trying to figure out how to define a virtual CTC between CP and the 
> 2nd level VM.
Mark, it is easy.

On first level, define one Virtual CTC (FCTC, SCTC) into TCPIP (or another 
capable machine) to connect to second level VM.

On second level VM, define and couple the Virtual CTC to first level TCPIP 
before his IPL (COMMAND into Directory is a good place to set it).
After the IPL, DEDICATE the CTC (the second level thinks it is a REAL CTC) to 
his TCPIP machine.
Done, you have the two TCPIPs connected by CTCs...

Work fine also for VTAM machines, RSCS, PVM, zOS and so long...

______________________________________________
Clovis Pereira


Error! Filename not specified.Mark Pace ---04/10/2010 10:06:05---Real CTC link 
are working between LPARs. I have a 2nd level VM that I dedicated a CTC address 
to tha
Error! Filename not specified.
From:

Error! Filename not specified.
Mark Pace <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Error! Filename not specified.
To:

Error! Filename not specified.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Error! Filename not specified.
Date:

Error! Filename not specified.
04/10/2010 10:06

Error! Filename not specified.
Subject:

Error! Filename not specified.
Re: z/VM ISFC links

Error! Filename not specified.
Sent by:

Error! Filename not specified.
The IBM z/VM Operating System 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

________________________________



Real CTC link are working between LPARs.
I have a 2nd level VM that I dedicated a CTC address to that is also talking to 
the other LPAR.

Now I'm trying to figure out how to define a virtual CTC between CP and the 2nd 
level VM.
CP DEFINE CTC is for a virtual machine.
VMA = LPAR
VMB = 2nd level VMA guest
VMC = LPAR


VMA -------- VMC
       ctc    |
 ?            |
VMB ----------+
        ctc

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Mark Wheeler 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In the Better Late (for John) Than Never department, the Redbook "FICON CTC 
Implementation" was published in 2001. Find it at 
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp0158.pdf


Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group

--

"Excellence. Always. If Not Excellence, What? If Not Excellence Now, When?"
Tom Peters, author of "The Little BIG Things"





> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:25:24 +0200
> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

> Subject: Re: z/VM ISFC links
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> When I set up something similar in a 6-lpar VM system almost 10 years
> ago, it took me quite some time to get the CTC defined correctly in
> the IOCP so that I had n-to-n connectivity. Of course this was in the
> days of stand-alone IOCP. I hope you have better tools.
>
> j.
>
> On 30 September 2010 19:00, Mark Pace 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > I see that now.
> > 1st criteria for this test is to share SFS across LPARs.
> > 2nd was to start learning about what will be involved with SSI.
> > So I guess I'm sticking to ISFC.
> > Glad I have extra ESCON and FICON CHPIDs.  Guess I'll start with ESCON as I
> > also have extra cables, no extra FICON cables.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Rob van der Heij 
> > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Mark Pace 
> >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think I'll also look into IPGATE.
> >>
> >> But that does not do ISFC ...
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark D Pace
> > Senior Systems Engineer
> > Mainline Information Systems
> >
> >
> >
> >



--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems







--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems




Reply via email to