George, are you saying that even AFTER the 14 PTF's for z196 support z/VM
5.4 still runs on a z9?
If so that clears up a misconception I had, and also makes life much easier.

Thakns

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:00 PM, George Henke/NYLIC <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt, wore it, and put it in a draw
> never to wear it again..
>
> The path of choice given the hardware, software, expiration dates, and
> upward and downward compatibility issue is:
>
>    -  z/VM 5.4 on z9
>    -  to z196 with the 14 APARs for 5.4 that support it
>    -  and then move to z/VM 6.whatever
>    -  but not 6.1 which:
>       - has a shorter expiration than 5.4
>       - not much more function to offer than 5.4
>       - does not run on a z9 anyway.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   *Tom Huegel <[email protected]>*
> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]>
>
> 11/24/2010 04:32 PM
>   Please respond to
> The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]>
>
>    To
> [email protected]
> cc
>   Subject
> Re: z/VM 5.1 on z196
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Les, that is pretty much what I suspected. The problem is the
> upgrade path. We currently have a z9 so 6.1 is not an option on this
> machine.
> So when the time comes to swap CPU.s what OS can I IPL on the z196 that I
> have tested on the z9?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Les Geer (607-429-3580) <*
> [email protected]* <[email protected]>> wrote:
> >The question came up today as to whether z/VM 5.1 will run on a z196. I
> know
> >there are no 5.1 PTF's available for z196 support.
> >How about z/VM 5.4, will it run WITHOUT the z196 PTF's?...
> >Any guesses? or experiences?
> >
>
> As z/VM 5.1 was never tested on a z196 we cannot provide an outlook of
> how it will behave.  However, given the nature of changes made to
> z/VM 5.4 and 6.1 to support z196, you may encounter unexpected,
> undesirable side effects.
>
> Given upgrading to z/VM 5.4, or better yet 6.1, is straight forward,
> why not pursue this avenue rather than rely on knowns?
>
> Best Regards,
> Les Geer
> IBM z/VM and Linux Development
>
>

Reply via email to