> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:10:41 -0500 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question > To: [email protected] <snip> > Btw, I don't see very much pressure being placed on z/VM to provide > client-side TLS support for homegrown RxSocket or Pipeline apps. I see > slightly more pressure for VM to provide user certificate-based single- > and two-factor authentication for TN3270E (and, inevitably, ftp and smtp). > > Alan Altmark > It would be nice if UFT(D) would support it. Mark Wheeler UnitedHealth Group
- z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Schuh, Richard
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Alan Altmark
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Schuh, Richard
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Richard Troth
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Alan Altmark
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Mark Wheeler
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Schuh, Richard
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Alan Altmark
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Richard Troth
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Alan Altmark
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Colin Allinson
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Alan Altmark
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Richard Troth
- Re: z/VM 6.1, SSLSERV Question Alan Ackerman
