On Tuesday, 01/18/2011 at 04:51 EST, Scott Rohling <[email protected]> wrote: > The DASD is defined as shared - but if you're really sharing this RACF database > - the 200 and 300 minidisks need to be fullpack minidisks. Cylinder 0 to END. > (DEVNO disks are recommended) > > I'm not saying this is the cause of the problem you are seeing .. but > RESERVE/RELEASE protection of the database between your z/VM systems isn't > happening the way you have it defined - and I thought I should point that out.
Some day I'd like to see the sysprog's *intent* expressed in SETROPTS and for RACF to ask CP whether or not the proper sacrifices have been made on behalf of the volumes containing the databases. Alan Altmark z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant IBM System Lab Services and Training ibm.com/systems/services/labservices office: 607.429.3323 [email protected] IBM Endicott
