Have you actually rebooted the guest from logon? This is saying your NIC is defined as an IP transport -- but the VSWITCH is ETHERNET. Did you mean to use ETHERNET or IP transport?
>From HELP HCP6024E: o The transport type of the NIC is set when either it has been coupled to a Guest LAN or VSWITCH or prior to being coupled, a guest operating system (OS) has attempted to activate the NIC. To reset the transport type of the NIC, it must be uncoupled from the Guest LAN or VSWITCH and all active OS connections must be terminated. It is recommended that a NIC be COUPLED to the desired VMLAN segment prior to being initialized by the host device driver. This is why I ask if you have actually rebooted (logged off the guest and back on from z/VM!) the guest since making these changes. It seems like your guest NIC is defined as IP (layer3) -- but your vswitch is ethernet (layer2). If you don't want to reboot or don't have access to z/VM logon: - DET NIC 800 (destroy the previous nic) - DEF NIC 800 TYPE QDIO - COUPLE 800 TO SYSTEM VSWSVC01 Scott Rohling 2011/1/20 Rogério Soares <rogerio.soa...@gmail.com> > > i make a test, that give a light.. > > I remove the grant, boot machine, give grant again, and online i tryed > using COUPLE command to to make device network on.. so i receive: > > > CP COUPLE 0800 TO SYSTEM VSWSVC01 > > HCPNDF6024E Incompatible Transport - SYSTEM VSWSVC01 is an Ethernet > Transport > > someone have idea that what type i should use? > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Scott Rohling <scott.rohl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> You really need to see this from the z/VM logon - before Linux is even >> booted. We need to see if CP complains about anything when it creates the >> NIC. We need to know why address 800 is not created (or is not coupled to >> the vswitch) - the messages at z/VM guest logon will provide valuable clues. >> >> Scott Rohling >> >> 2011/1/20 Rogério Soares <rogerio.soa...@gmail.com> >> >>> on boot i have only >>> >>> lo >>> ..doneWaiting for mandatory devices: eth0 __NSC__ >>> 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 >>> 4 3 2 1 >>> 0 >>> eth0 No interface found >>> ..failedSetting up service (localfs) network . . . . . . . . . >>> ...fail >>> ed >>> Starting rpcbind ..done >>> Not starting NFS client services - no NFS found in /etc/fstab:..unused >>> Mount CIFS File Systems ..unused >>> Starting irqbalance ..unused >>> Setting up (remotefs) network interfaces: >>> Setting up service (remotefs) network . . . . . . . . . ...done >>> >>> Starting SSH daemon..done >>> Starting cupsd..done >>> Starting Name Service Cache Daemon..done >>> Starting mail service (Postfix)..done >>> Starting service xdm..done >>> Starting CRON daemon..done >>> Starting smartd ..unused >>> Starting INET services. (xinetd)..done >>> Master Resource Control: runlevel 5 has been reached >>> Failed services in runlevel 5: Ý80C Ý14Dnetwork >>> Skipped services in runlevel 5: Ý80C Ý43Dnfs smbfs irq_balancer splash >>> smartd >>> >>> >>> >>> Welcome to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP1 (s390x) - Kernel >>> 2.6.32.12-0.7-d >>> efault (ttyS0). >>> >>> >>> thor login: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Scott Rohling >>> <scott.rohl...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Can you see the startup messages from the guest (from an actual LOGON)? >>>> You should be able to see some type of error for 800 .. either that or >>>> you >>>> didn't put the directory online before restarting the guest? >>>> >>>> Scott Rohling >>>> >>>> 2011/1/20 Rogério Soares <rogerio.soa...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Dear friends, >>>>> >>>>> i have a new problem today.. >>>>> >>>>> For the first time i tryed set a vswitch using port group definitions >>>>> using: >>>>> >>>>> set port group grpsrv01 join 1D00.P0 1E00.P0 >>>>> >>>>> Port group GRPSRV01 is created >>>>> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 11:19:10 >>>>> >>>>> DEFINE VSWITCH VSWSVC01 ETHERNET RDEV 0800.P0 GROUP GRPSRV01 >>>>> VSWITCH SYSTEM VSWSVC01 is created >>>>> >>>>> SET VSWITCH VSWSVC01 GRANT THOR >>>>> >>>>> q vswitch vswsvc01 acc >>>>> >>>>> VSWITCH SYSTEM VSWSVC01 Type: QDIO Connected: 1 Maxconn: INFINITE >>>>> PERSISTENT RESTRICTED ETHERNET Accounting: OFF >>>>> VLAN Unaware >>>>> MAC address: 02-61-01-00-00-01 MAC Protection: Unspecified >>>>> State: Ready >>>>> IPTimeout: 5 QueueStorage: 8 >>>>> Isolation Status: OFF >>>>> Authorized userids: >>>>> SYSTEM THOR >>>>> Uplink Port: >>>>> Group: GRPSRV01 Active LACP Mode: Active >>>>> RDEV: 1D00.P00 VDEV: 1D00 Controller: DTCVSW2 >>>>> RDEV: 1E00.P00 VDEV: 1E00 Controller: DTCVSW1 >>>>> Backup Devices: >>>>> RDEV: 0800.P00 VDEV: 0800 Controller: DTCVSW2 BACKUP >>>>> Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:04:10 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> on USER DIRECT i set: >>>>> >>>>> 02125 USER THOR THOR 512M 512M G >>>>> 02126 INCLUDE LINDFLT >>>>> 02127 MACHINE ESA 2 >>>>> 02128 CPU 00 >>>>> 02129 NICDEF 0800 TYPE QDIO LAN SYSTEM VSWSVC01 >>>>> 02130 * DISCO S.O >>>>> 02131 MDISK 100 3390 0001 10016 LX9B52 MW >>>>> >>>>> but , when i tried make linux up, appears like there is no device 0800 >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> query #cp q nic direct on guest i have: >>>>> >>>>> CP Q NIC >>>>> Default System MAC Protection: OFF >>>>> Network Device Allocation: Permitted >>>>> >>>>> before using link aggregation, i guet a lot of information more like >>>>> this: >>>>> >>>>> 00: CP Q NIC >>>>> 00: Adapter 0800.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3 >>>>> 00: MAC: 02-00-00-00-00-0F VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWSVC01 >>>>> >>>>> There is a special definition on vswitch or user direct to make a guest >>>>> using link aggregation? I can't find any aditional information... thanks >>>>> again for any help. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
