Comment #2 on issue 446 by wanghz: Why GBK support is not enabled by default http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=446
Thank you for your reply. If the performance penalty with GBK enabled is noticeable, it should be disabled by default of course. But in this case, maybe another bug report about why performance is bad when GBK is enabled would be issued ... For my personal experience, however, the performance has no obvious degradation if GBK is enabled in fact. For better user experience, I hope GBK is enabled because I don't believe GB2312 is enough in daily use. The reason why I issue the report is that the Debian maintainer for ibus refuses to enable it without you, the upstream developer, agreeing on it. More importantly, he also refuses to mention the problem in document README.Debian. Anyway, it is your right to make such a decision. Maybe mentioning the existence of GBK support in README is enough? I just wish novice users have better experience without having to check every available options of such a daily-used ime software. Bye. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ibus-devel" group. iBus project web page: http://code.google.com/p/ibus/ iBus dev group: http://groups.google.com/group/ibus-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
