Comment #11 on issue 861 by [email protected]: 速成送字和上一頁/下一頁的問題
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=861
On Windows 7, I see Quick and new Quick.
New Quick is an automated version of Quick that doesn't require the user to
manually select every characters. (Like what ibus-pinyin is doing.)
1. Is such work copyright-clean to be included in our official releases?
I am not a lawyer. But I believe it is clean. I wrote the script to
simulate typing on the keyboard. I own the copyright of the script. I
didn't reverse-engineer the Quick input method in Windows 7. I am just
treating it as a black box.
2. We have Chinese filtering mechanism quite different from that of
Windows. How can we achieve best result given that we cannot change
underlying stuff much (otherwise it may break other tables).
In Issue 1188, there are a git commit that add support for per table
Chinese mode. We can just define the table to use big mode which do not do
filtering at all.
But we still need to find a way to set the IBus LookupTable (the one that
is used to select candidate characters) to 9 characters per page in order
to show exactly the same ordering.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "ibus-devel" group.
iBus project web page: http://code.google.com/p/ibus/
iBus dev group: http://groups.google.com/group/ibus-devel?hl=en
