Hi Derek,

 

I think Catalina owners in general have put either Catalina's through
rougher conditions and have flow much higher technology sails (i.e. faster
and under much higher loads) than the factory anticipated 30 years ago. This
is certainly true of the racing crowd and maybe cruisers to a lesser extent.
I know the factory new anticipated I'd single hand a C22 in 54 knots. Yet it
survived but it was a newer model with an extended tang head stem fitting.
The head stem fitting on our '76 nearly peeled off the deck in conditions in
gusting to 40 knots.

 

I suspect the surveyor was not wrong to note it, and it could be a factor
for a comparison shopper, but it unto itself shouldn't kill a sale.

 

http://www.catalinadirect.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&product_I
D=1108&ParentCat=59

 

Phil Agur
<http://www.catalina27.org/public_pages/profile270.htm> s/v Wing Tip 
C270 LE #184            MMSI 366901790 



 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Derek Atkin
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [IC27A] Post survey questions on deck moisture & forestay

 

  

I have my 79 c27 on the market. Had a potential buyer, who commissioned a
survey. I never did one when I got the boat. The hull was fine, most of the
deck was fine except near the stanchions and the chain-plates. The surveyor
indicated moisture as high as 25%. I am curious - is this common? I figured
that the fittings should all be re-bedded but does it represent a major
problem with the boat? Everything looks good from underneath and the rig is
holding tension - I will obviously disclose it to any other potential buyers
- but is it a major detriment to boat?

The surveyor also made mention that the factory forestay tang was
insuffiicent and there was a risk it would rip out. The boat is a standard
rig, and I have not heard of this as a C27 issue before. Has anyone else
come across it? Below is a link to a pic of the nose of the boat.

http://www.opus45.com/c27_pics/DSCN3370.JPG

thanks

Derek A.
#4297



Reply via email to