> If this is what this list is going to be reduced to I've had enough.
> Cheryl

Cheryl,

I am the first person to see the christopher email and respond.  for
whatever reason it did not show up until a couple of days later, or
some time later when many others had responded in a more rational
manner.  as I said when i wrote it, i was livid, i mean positively
livid.  i apologize for my furious knee jerk response.  could we
perhaps discuss his post in a sane rational manner point by point
leaving emotions out?  I would like to state my views and would be
interested in yours.  maybe we could rename the thread cause this one
is already so long.  I feel your anger is directed at me and my angry
response.  but homestly cheryl, how on earth could anyone agree with
some of the things he said.

do you honestly believe domestic bred horses are inferior?
do you honestly believe its a godd thing to eat the bad ones?
do you honestly believe domestic bred horses are from inferior bloodlines?

lets talk about it.  again, i apologize to the list for my emotional
outburst.  but perhaps we could talk about it now?  I will try not to
lose my temper again!  but if we just stick to the things he said and
discuss them, then i really dont see how anyone could argue much
because the things he said are just so offbase.  most of them.
janice
-- 
yipie tie yie yo

Reply via email to