>>. To me, breeding is generally a crapshoot.

I would say there is always "an element of crapshoot" to breeding, but if
there weren't a few certainties, we'd never had ended up with collies that
99.99% of the time look like collies, and never look like Dachshunds.  If we
pay attention to the good traits we're breeding for, I think it's safe to
say that the odds of getting really unexpected results is at least seriously
minimized.   For example, in the Weimaraner breed of dogs, the coat should
be short, smooth, and slightly silky as compared to a Lab's for example.
But, even though the breed has been breed with that coat for generations,
there is still an occasional wire-haired or long-haired individual that
crops up.  It's rare, but it happens - or it did 25 years ago, which is
about the last time I paid much attention to the genetics of the breed.

Icelandic's virtually always look like Icelandic's - sure, some have more
mane than others, and some are stockier than others, but if we can have as
much consistency in the appearance of the breed as we do, I think it's
reasonable to expect more consistency in the breed's gaits.  In other words,
I don't think it unreasonable to expect the breed to have fewer pacey
individuals, and fewer three-gaited ones too - if gaitedness is truly a
breed goal.

Karen Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to