--- Judy Ryder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If we don't like the USIHC, why would we join them? > > > > Because if you want to inact change, you gotta get involved, > > We are involved; maybe it's outside of the USIHC, but that's OK; > things are changing. They don't want change. Is it fair to try to > go into their organization and change them? > > We have had more success in improving things for the breed, doing > it from outside of the USIHC. > > We are evoking change from the outside without causing any > dissention in their group. Isn't that more fair? better? > > I think if we joined the USIHC and tried to change them, maybe > someone would be saying right now, "why don't you go somewhere else > if you want change, and leave them alone?" > > That's the other side of the coin. > > I think we are doing things the right way, as we are. > > And we're being ever more positively productive than wasting time > trying to get someone else to change (wouldn't that be negative > energy?). Where would we be today if all of our energy had been > wasted on trying to change the USIHC rather than pursuing our > positive road? > > We're doing good for the breed! And you are part of that!! > > Thanks!
I agree with all of that Judy...just can not stand the bitching from some people about the Congress.....lets change things from the outside, and not Bitch about them or some of the high priced breeders.....keep changing from the outside and leave them alone if that is what feels comfortable. S. Lee
