On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:50:37 -0400, you wrote:

>Personally I would remove the sweet feed because I've heard that is
>like feeding candy; and from what I've read about the beet pulp, it's
>a good filler.

This is a 30 year old horse, unfit, not been ridden for a long time,
suddenly had a saddle put on and ridden in trot and canter. Now, to
me, that seems like simply asking for trouble. And not because of what
he's being fed - a 30 year old will have much higher needs if he's to
maintain weight through the winter, and once he loses weight you will
find it really hard to get it back on him.

Beet pulp is indeed a filler - the treatment modern beet pulp
undergoes when the sugar is extracted means it's not an awful lot more
than *just* a filler with a few vitamins and minerals. This old guy
probably needs his sweet feed too.

It sounds to me like he has some kind of pain issue - not that
surprising if he's had a long rest, then been asked to trot and canter
out of the blue. I would guess he hurt, and he said in the only way
left "get the hell off me, lady!". So he got more riding, pretty
intense from the sound of it, to teach him a lesson....

If you had had a long break from exercise (and you were a pensioner to
boot!), you would not start with a 5 mile run. You should not ask your
poor old horse to do the same - please, I know this probably sounds
harsh, but have some common sense! Start him gently, just 10 minutes
at walk only for a week or two, gradually building him up to an hour
or so. Then start adding some trot (or tolt or whatever he finds
easiest). Finally, once you've built up some basic fitness, think
about cantering. Give the guy a break, he deserves better.

Mic


Mic (Michelle) Rushen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solva Icelandic Horses and DeMeulenkamp Sweet Itch Rugs: 
www.solva-icelandics.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes"

Reply via email to