>From Hoof Rehab, which has to do with the previous post titled: Newly 
Discovered Shock Absorber in the Equine Foot, located here:

http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/IceHorses/message/112548



The most common cause of hoof sensitivity and the biggest crux we face, 
actually lies in the back of the foot. The wild horses show us that the hoof 
should have an arch from front to back, like the arch of your foot and that 
the heel bulbs/frogs and heels should bear the initial impact force 
together, with a low heel that doesn't lift the frog off the ground.

The coffin bone should shape the front half of the foot, thus the front half 
of that natural arch so the healthy hoof at rest should have a palmar angle 
of 3-5 degrees relative to the ground, with the back of P3 being slightly 
elevated. (Or it should be parallel to whatever the angle the solar surface 
of the front half of the foot may naturally be.)

On hard impact, this arch compresses flat and the back of the foot should be 
loaded first, giving us a ground parallel impact force to P3.

The "soundness problems" some barefoot trimmers face lie in the placing of 
more emphasis to the hoof mechanics of the horse standing on concrete, than 
to the mechanics of the hoof in motion.... The mechanics of impact are by 
far the most significant.

Dr. Robert Bowker's (Michigan State University) research reveals that 
traditionally managed domestic horses consistently fail to fully develop the 
back of the foot. The digital cushion is a very important nerve center 
hidden beneath the frog. When a foal is born, the digital cushion is 
comprised of fatty tissues, offering the right amount of protection to the 
nerves, for the impact force generated by the weight of a foal. The nerves 
are "exposed" enough to provide "feel", yet protected enough not to register 
pain on rocky terrain.

Every step the wild foal makes causes a bit of growth of dense 
fibrocartilage to spread through the digital cushion. It starts its journey 
at the front, just beneath the apex of the frog and gradually spreads 
towards the heel bulbs.

By the time a wild horse reaches adult weight, the digital cushion has been 
transformed into a tough, dense mass of fibrocartilage. (The same process 
can happen for domestic horses under natural hoof care, with freedom to 
move.)

At the same time, this movement, hoof expansion and flexion has been at work 
stimulating and completing the development of the lateral cartilages. The 
lateral cartilages have grown from 1/8 inch thick to a full inch thick (in 
the lower part where you cannot see them above the hairline.), and a "floor" 
of cartilage has also developed between the frog's corium and the digital 
cushion.

This completed development of strong but flexible cartilage provides a very 
solid foundation for the back half of the foot. The end result is a very 
stable but yielding, shock absorbing "back half" of the foot.

The "nerve center" in the digital cushion is well protected; nestled within 
the denser digital cushion and encased within the mass of thick lateral 
cartilage. This healthy arrangement protects the nerves from 
"overstimulation" and sensitivity, under the impact force of an adult horse.

A lack of frog stimulation and hoof distortion from birth throughout our 
domestic horses' lives cause this process to be much slower or nonexistent. 
Often a 1200 pound adult domestic foot has inner structures of digital 
cushion and cartilage that are suitable to offer the protection to the 
nerves that are normal for a 200 pound foal.

Many of our horses' hooves have grown to adult size, but still have the 1/8 
inch thick  immature lateral cartilages, little or no "floor" of cartilage, 
and a digital cushion comprised of weakly constructed fatty tissue.

What does this mean? Most of our frogs are incapable of being the "landing 
zone" nature intended. (Many horses' heels remain high heeled and contracted 
as a pure defense mechanism to limit the pressure on the underdeveloped 
structures.) How do we fix this?

Miles and miles of stimulation to the rear half of the foot.

According to Dr. Bowker, this process can begin at any age, but must be done 
while the horse is barefoot. Frog pressure alone doesn't cut it. It is 
pressure and release.

A fixed shoeing method that provides constant frog pressure counts as only 
one impact out of thousands the horse needs to complete this development. 
(The same goes with sole pressure and development as well, by the way).

The other important factor to this development of proper structure 
(specifically the lateral cartilages) is the flexion of the hoof capsule; 
not just expansion, but distortion front to back and the "twisting" of the 
hoof capsule on firm, varied terrain.

When a foal is born, all four feet are the EXACT same (even microscopically 
according to Dr. Bowker). The dramatically greater work load of the foal's 
hind feet allow for much more natural development in the back of the hoof.

By the time most domestic horses reach adult weight, they have all the right 
stuff in the hinds, and incomplete development of the fronts. This, of 
course, leads to sensitive front feet and is also the ONLY reason the fronts 
are more susceptible to founder and navicular disease than the hinds. (Aside 
from improper trimming/shoeing.)

So in other words, without changing anything in an individual horse's 
lifestyle, diet or terrain, the fronts could be just as healthy as the hinds 
if only there was more frog pressure every day; more work; more stimulation 
and more hoof flexion.

[Foals raised under routine, competent natural hoof care do consistently 
develop proper structure of their front feet, though, so a large part of 
this is simply the tradition of allowing foal hooves to overgrow, lifting 
the living foot out of function, and to then shoe them before the 
development of the foot is complete. I should point out here that when the 
foot is allowed to develop properly and the foals weight hasn't fallen 
behind its inner structure development, the result will be frogs that 
actually protrude longer than the heels; yearning to absorb more energy. 
Don't fight this; it's a good thing! ]

_________________________


Judy
http://icehorses.net
http://clickryder.com



Reply via email to