On Feb 2, 2008, at 2:34 PM, Janice McDonald wrote: > >>> What is the conclusion? We need to learn more about what causes the >>> symptoms. >> >> I would say that these horses are reacting (or not) to something >> other >> than culicoides > > nope. this first portion of the study was to test for culicoides > only. This is the results to CULICOIDES. So now we find out next > test what they are further alergic to in addition. > janice > Hell Janice:
Yes, I realize that this test was for culicoides. But since, for instance, Valurs low value (27) is not at all in sync with his fairly severe symptoms, I am saying that they are caused by something other than no-see-ums. And I wonder what it is. Anneliese
