>>>>> John, for what it's worth:   Anne Elwell always used to tell people 
>>>>> (myself included) that Elisabeth's horses lacked gait.   I don't know 
>>>>> if she still
 tells folks that or not, but "way back when" that's what she apparently 
thought.   Maybe that was her personal opinion of them -- which she was 
certainly entitled to --  but she tended to state this as a commonly-known 
fact.   I think quite a few folks (not meaning Karen, but people in the 
breed in general) have taken that sentiment as fact in judging (perhaps very 
unfairly) Elisabeth's horses and breeding program.


I've heard that too, but I PERSONALLY don't necessarily believe that about 
Elisabeth's horses.  I haven't met that many of them, but the two I 
currently own (Trausti and Flekka) both are very nicely gaited...and both 
were purchased by their prior owners with some intent on using them for 
endurance.  It didn't work out for either of them to be endurance horses, 
and ultimately I bought them, but not as "endurance prospects."  I'll never 
promote either of them as "endurance prospects" if I should decide to sell 
them.  They aren't.


I got that Remington isn't "strongly gaited" from John's past posts...and I 
think he said that again today.  I'm not sure why he feels he should lecture 
me about this. I LIKE many three-gaited horses.  It's not like it's an 
insult for a horse not to have strong gaits, if that's appropriate for the 
job he's doing...


Karen Thomas, NC

Reply via email to