>>>> I did see it and had a good laugh over Janice's post because Karen's >>>> take is quite accurate. "Nada". I don't want to over-promote the >>>> videos, but I was expecting much more of a reaction. A few people >>>> commented on Hestakaup.com and that's it. It certainly did not trigger >>>> any discussion and there are a number of issues that have nothing to do >>>> with biomechanics or saddles that also could have been addressed.
Stan, I sure hope you noticed that we discussed it here, even though some of the stuff we've discussed before. If you leave it up, I'm sure we'll reference it again, as new members come on board, and more topics evolve. I was very interested in much of what your guy said. He seems very knowledgeable, and quite credible, and I know he must have felt uncomfortable saying some of the things he said. I'm not sure I agree with everything he said, but much of what he said is at least worthy of deep consideration. It's a good starting point for discussions, that's for sure. >>>> This series of videos was indeed departure from most of my previous >>>> videos in that it was overtly instructional rather than the cultural >>>> documentaries that I have been presenting. Maybe it was less >>>> entertaining... You know, you may have just nailed part of the differences in this list and some others. Entertainment is certainly a good thing - and we have Janice to take care of that here - but the needs of the horses are often rather boring to the general public. I guess I enjoy good entertainment as much as anyone, but my heart belongs to my horses, and I have to take care of them first. And, for what it's worth, I found this one very entertaining - but we all know that I'm a geek. :) BTW, Stan, do you have a clue what you're going to do next re: saddles for your horses? Karen Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
