> ". . . Emphasis on instructors to teach not just riding but also > horsemanship!" > > I've been chewing on this statement. What is riding versus what is > horsemanship? Have you guys ever thought about this?
My first thoughts (before my first lesson) were that I would be taught how to just be around horses. Then how to observe their behaviour. Then how to interact in a friendly way. Next some groundwork such as leading. Lessons in tack and grooming. Eventually I might be thought good enough to start riding lessons. The truth was riding a subdued horse who was alrady tacked up was where it started in UK. There is a lot more to horsemanship than bum in saddle. I knew it as a beginner. I felt completely insecure and tense on the horse and I'm sure the horse felt so too. Many people ride but can't lead the horse effectively or do any groundwork. I know people who start youngsters under saddle with no preparation. Then they whip the horse for not understanding the aids. Trailer loading is done with lunge lines and a broom. Maybe I'm glad I wasn't taught these things. So for me riding is a small but important part of horsemanship. I have learned more about riding from the ground than from lessons. I'm a beginner so my ideas may be a bit crazy. Sue UK
