Am 31.10.2014 um 02:16 schrieb Michael Martinez: Hi all –
Are the two methods given in the docs Chapter 7.7 still basically the generally accepted practice for redundancy/failover? Or has some other method come into play since these docs were written? Afaik these docs were inherited from Nagios when forked, and apply only to Icinga Core 1.x. Modern systems (our projects at customers for instance) are built using technologies such as pacemaker, corosync, drbd even and additional tools for failover scenarios in an active/passive cluster. Simply said, these docs might work, but are imho not the reality. Using Icinga 2 you'll love the cluster functionality which saves you already an amount of time as application cluster with integrated failover capabilities in an active/active (multiple nodes possible) cluster setup. Kind regards, Michael -- Michael Friedrich, DI (FH) Application Developer NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77 GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461 http://www.netways.de | [email protected] ** OSMC 2014 - November - netways.de/osmc ** ** OpenNebula Conf 2014 - Dezember - opennebulaconf.com ** ** OSDC 2015 - April - osdc.de ** ** Puppet Camp Berlin 2015 - April - netways.de/puppetcamp **
_______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
