This is probably what's happening. will test and come back with a reply. On 22-Oct-15 1:35 AM, Brian O'Neill wrote: > Are the services going into a HARD state before the host is? Depending > on the values of check_interval, retry_interval and max_check_attempts > for the host and the services, it is possible that the services are > entering a hard state before the host does. Once the host hits a hard > state, the service notifications are suppressed. > > > On 10/21/2015 4:51 PM, Horatiu N wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In the docs it sais that all services belonging to a host are >> automatically linked (dependencies applied) so that when the host is >> down the notification doesnt apply to them and only one notification is >> sent regarding the host being down, which makes sense since some hosts >> can have loads of services running on them. >> But this does not apply as far as i've seen. When a host goes down (lab >> tested, machine gets pulled off network) i still get the mail >> notifications regarding it's services before i get the notification >> regarding the host itself. >> >> What can i do to prevent this ? >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> icinga-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users >> > _______________________________________________ > icinga-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
