Hi,
On 08/02/2017 03:46 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote:
Hi,
On 2. Aug 2017, at 10:08, Johannes Oettl <joe...@zid.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
Hello,
I want to switch to icinga2, and I have a lot of check_mk based snmp-checks.
I have 1 active snmp check per host, and I submit the results as passive checks
to the core. Right now I submit the check results to the core via checkresult
spool dir.
I would suggest switching to the REST API and rely on https remotely,
process-check-result is the action you are looking for. I wouldn’t go the route
with command pipe or spool dir.
If I can submit over 800 checkresults at once, I am happy :)
Is this possible in Icinga2? What I must modify in my plugin? On a cisco
wireless
lan controller I have over 800 passive checks.
Not sure which plugin you’re using. AFAIK checkmk uses their own check plugins
which are executed on the master, sending back the check results to the core.
wrote my own small plugin in python with easysnmp to get rid of all
other check_mk stuff.
I like the concept of only one snmp check per host, but not the other
stuff.
Customizing checkmk was not funny, and I don't want do it again.
Never tried to incorporate checkmk with Icinga 2, and I personally wouldn’t
bother to do so. Look for existing check plugins such as check_nwc_health or
similar and kill checkmk away.
I will test check_nwc_health.
Johannes
--
ZENTRALER INFORMATIK DIENST - ABTEILUNG KOMMUNIKATION
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET WIEN
A - 1040 Wien, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10/E020C
Tel.: +43 (1) 58801-420421
Fax.: +43 (1) 58801-42099 http://www.zid.tuwien.ac.at/kom
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.icinga.org
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
