On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:50:50AM +0100, Michael Friedrich wrote: > i'm not saying it's "best". I might say, that under various wierd > circumstances the "check_period" with some timeperiod other than 0-24 > could fail and lead into strange reschedule strategy (1 week in the > future). i've seen that code, i have debugged that code, i can't find > the bug. the actual "exclude" directive has been fixed by Hiren Patel a > while ago, and is not affected by that problem - in Nagios this is still > the case, but also a different bug (not to be mixed with this one!) > > since this bug affects the check scheduler, and not the notifications, i > am more eager to advise to do such exclusions on the notification layer. > set your contacts to not get notified during the easter holidays. this > is the way i do it in my configs, if i have to. >
Hello Michael, sadly it's not as easy as that as it would mean defining new contacts for all non-24x7 services, right? i had hoped it would be possible to modify the "workhours" timeperiod for notifications directly using the "exclude" config syntax, or am I missing something? If, as you imply, the "notification" code is not affected by the bug, it should be safe to modify the notification_period and leave the check_period alone, right? All the best, Uwe -- NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann AG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
