Am 23.04.2013 18:50, schrieb Michael Friedrich: > On 23.04.2013 18:39, Joseph Spenner wrote: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *>From:* Wolfgang <w...@gmx.net> >> *>To:* icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> *>Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2013 10:34 PM >> *>Subject:* Re: [icinga-users] notifications when there shouldn't be.. >> > >> >At 23.04.2013 01:24, schrieb Joseph Spenner: >>> Hello, I'm using Icinga 1.5.0, and have a question about some >>> notifications I'm receiving which aren't expected. >>> I'm monitoring 141 devices, and today added about another 200. The >>> additional 200 are just doing a PING. >>> >>> I have a "default-host" and "default-service", which is set to >>> page/email me for the original 141 devices. During the testing of the >>> new 200 devices I have a special "contact_groups" defined to bypass >>> the default, and placed in the host definitions. It is designed to >>> send the email/notifications to a different address for these new 200 >>> devices. It's been working great, but about every hour I'll get a >>> notification from one of these 200 devices to the default email >>> address. I know there are several of the 200 devices not reachable, >>> but I shouldn't be getting the pages/notifications to the default >>> email address. It's as if it isn't following the exception rule >>> ~sometimes~. >>> Is it possible I'm reaching a limit on the number of hosts I can >>> process in a given time? >>> It's running on a VM, but the system doesn't seem to be suffereing-- >>> performance-wise. >>> >>> Any help would be great. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Joseph Spenner >>> >>> >> > Please show the definition for this service taken from objects.cache. >> >> Wolfgang: >> Thanks for the reply! Actually, after looking at that file, I saw that >> the 'define host' was pointing at my test address, but 'define service' >> section was still pointing to my live email/group. However, after >> finding that and fixing it, I'm curious why I didn't get about 70 pages >> from all the other hosts/services which I know were not reachable during >> this test and should have paged me for the same reason. I only got a >> page from a couple of devices. >> So, I'm still curious if I'm hitting some threshold again. Is there a >> good way to know for sure? > Again, please show some config snippets. it's pretty hard to follow your > thinking from initial issue to resolved issue questioning other causes. > Depending on your definitions you might have used "parents" so that might keep you from getting notifications for unreachable hosts but without having more information it's just wild guessing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
